IBUY, XRT: Retailers Are Out Of Fashion And Out Of Luck – Seeking Alpha

nicoletaionescu/iStock via Getty Images
A couple of weeks back, we promised to “share extracts from our weekly reviews.” This article, taken from an analysis originally published for Wheel of Fortune’s subscribers on Nov. 28, is part of that effort.
——————————————————————————–
US retailers are due to face a tougher (than usual) holiday season.
According to S&P Global Market Intelligence, seasonal sales adjusted for inflation are likely to fall 1.2% Y/Y – the first decline since 2009.

Bloomberg
This may not be the last straw that breaks the retail camel’s back (a recession might do that), but it’s certainly putting serious sticks in the retail industry’s wheels that make a big share of its annual sales during the holiday season.
The past year has been particularly hard for retailers and this is reflected in the performance of the leading retail ETFs. Having said that, it’s important to make a difference between the general/broader ETFs – SPDR S&P Retail ETF (NYSEARCA:XRT) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) – to the online-focused ETFs – Amplify Online Retail ETF (NYSEARCA:IBUY) and ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN).
The former have been performing better than the latter, likely thanks to many people who are still looking to pay a (physical) visit to brick-and-mortar (“B&M”) retail stores, following the long period of COVID lockdowns and supply-chain disruptions.
So much so that RTH is performing in-line with the broader market (SPY), which is quite remarkable taking into consideration how quickly the economy has shifted from record growth to recession fears.
Even XRT, though delivering twice as negative return as RTH does, is comfortably outperforming ONLN and IBUY by ~17% and 24%, respectively.

Y-Charts, Author
Similarly to economic growth, the shift from “only online” shopping back to “let’s get physical” shopping is also stunning. More accurately, it wasn’t a “shift” per-se rather the loss of the “online mojo” that shined so brightly in 2020 and early 2021 at the expense of B&M.
While ONLN and IBUY peaked in the middle of the first quarter of 2021, XRT and RTH kept on going until the middle of the fourth quarter of 2021 before they surrendered to the deteriorating economy, as well as to the entire stock market.

Y-Charts, Author
Recession fears, fueled by the fastest and most brutal monetary policy tightening we’ve ever seen, are doing no favor to retailers either.
Weak sales, higher rates, consumer sentiment at record lows, and a general feeling that it’s going to get (a lot) worse before it gets better are taking a significant toll from retail ETFs.
So much so that they’re all trading nowadays with the largest drawdowns they’ve ever (or at least since the GFC; only XRT goes back that far) experienced.

Y-Charts
Just as consumers fear, the main problem is that the worst might still be ahead for the retail industry.
The yield-curve keeps sending recessionary signals.
Not only that the 10-2 spread is digging multi-year lows almost every day nowadays, but the UST10Y is now lower even than the Fed Funds Rate (“FFR”)!

Bloomberg
Here is a chart of the 10-year/3-month spread.
Shaded areas = recessions. Red = inversion.
Inversion of this spread (for more than a couple of days*) has historically led to a recession, without ever failing.
*In Sep. 1998, the spread inverted on only 2 different days, and a recession didn’t follow.
We’re now at an inversion streak of 10 consecutive days .

Bianco Research
And as this table shows, over the last 50+ years when the 3-month/10-year yield curve inverted for 10 consecutive days, we had a perfect score (8 for 8) in predicting recessions.
The average lead time is 311 days, or about 10 months, so don’t assume that the US economy will be out of the woods by mid-2023.

Bianco Research
Another reliable gauge that has never issued a false signal before (since its inception in 1979), is the Ned Davis Research US Coincident Index.
Last week, the index flashed a recession warning, so based on history, a US recession is on its way (and not too far ahead).

Ned Davis Research
On the other hand, as we all know, even if the economy isn’t doing so well, stocks can still perform well.
The stock market isn’t the economy.

NYU, FRED
Since 1950, the S&P 500 has peaked (on average) 6 months before a recession has started, and it has bottomed (on average) 3 months prior to when a recession has ended.
[This time is different I guess, because the S&P 500 peaked in late Dec. 2021 (we’re now 11 months since that, and counting). That, of course, unless the index intends to peak soon, ahead of a recession in 2023…]

Bloomberg, eToro
But there’s still some hope after all.
Since 1950, Q4 has been the S&P 500’s strongest quarter (+3.3% on average), especially true in midterm election years (+6.6% on average).

Bloomberg, eToro
Futures are now pricing a terminal FFR greater than 5%.

CME
However, they’re also predicting a rate cut as early as in July 2023.

Bloomberg
And while everyone is focused on the tightening cycle while the Fed continues to shrink its holdings of Treasury bonds and notes at the steepest pace in history.

Bloomberg, Crescat Capital
Per the National Retail Federation here are the top-10 US retailers according to their last FY US retail sales:
With the exception of Amazon (100% online since day 1), all of these retailers are legacy chains that started operating way before anyone knew what “online shopping” is.
Obviously, they’ve evolved over time and now their online legs are just as strong and meaningful as their B&M legs, if not more.
Nonetheless, by and large they fit the “old school” category that theoretically should have allowed them to be more immune to the recent slump.
Is this indeed the case?
The average top-10 retailer is down -14.6% YTD, near perfectly aligned with the total return of RTH (-14.7% YTD).
However, if we exclude AMZN, the average top-10 retailer is down only -11.2% YTD – better by ~3.5% than RTH (=cutting about 1/4 of the negative total return), surely any of the other retail ETFs for that matter.

Y-Charts
Running the same drill when looking at the performance since March 23, 2020 (market bottom during the COVID era) we get some interesting, different, results:
First and foremost, it’s worthwhile noting that AMZN is the only name with negative performance (-32.4%). All other 9 names are up, and if we put WBA’s +4.7% aside, all remaining 8 names have returned at least 25%.
Not great maybe, but surely not bad.
The average top-10 retailer is up +40.4% during that period, way lower than XRT (+147.0%) and RTH (+72.7%), but way higher than IBUY (+14.1%) and ONLN (+6.0%).
If we exclude AMZN, the average top-10 retailer is improving to +48.5% during that period.

Y-Charts
Per the fund’s website (emphases mine), XRT “seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Retail Select Industry Index… Seeks to provide exposure the retail segment of the S&P TMI, which comprises the following sub-industries: Apparel Retail, Automotive Retail, Computer & Electronic Retail, Department Stores, Drug Retail, Food Retailers, General Merchandise Stores, Hypermarkets & Super Centers, Internet & Direct Marketing Retail, and Specialty Stores“
Classic B&M-oriented.
Per the fund’s website (emphases mine), IBUY “seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price performance of the EQM Online Retail Index. The Index is a globally-diverse basket of publicly-traded companies that obtain 70% or more of revenue from online or virtual sales.”
Classic online-oriented.
Interestingly, none of the top-10 retailers has found its way into the top-10 holdings of IBUY (unsurprisingly, taking into consideration it’s an online retail ETF) or XRT (which is quite a surprise).
When we compared the top-10 holdings of the two funds, there’s only one name (Chewy (CHWY)) that appears in both.
Here are the top-10 holdings of XRT [Source]:
Here are the top-10 holdings of IBUY [Source]:
IBUY is clearly more concentrated than XRT, another factor that may have played in favor of the latter during the recent slump.
We’re predominantly fundamental investors.
As such, and taking into consideration how bad things are looking for the US and global economy, there’s no way we can give our blessing for the retail industry as a whole.
Truth is, retail ETFs are a SELL in our book, even after losing so much of their value already.
XRT still has two significant lines of defense underneath the current price.
Nevertheless, the first line of defense (at the low 50s) still represents a downside of about 20% – not something we would wish to put ourselves into right now.
And if a 20% downside doesn’t sound too appealing, how about low-mid 30s, where the second line of defense is. That’s halving from here, and a good reminder for us all that a stock can still halve even after going through halving beforehand.
It also looks as if the 200-DMA is forming a steady and consistent resistance (throughout 2022), implying that XRT has very little upside to offer.

Y-Charts, Author
Unlike XRT, IBUY has only one line of defense left (underneath the current price), because the fund has already broken the first line of defense (which has now turned into resistance, above the current price).
The good news is that there’s more upside potential for IBUY than for XRT.
The bad news is that the IBUY is currently almost sitting on its second line of defense, so breaking down from here means there’s nothing in the way.
IBUY is also trading only ~2% above its 50-DMA, adding another layer to the anyhow-shaky ground this fund walks on.
Do you want to look at the half-full of the “IBUY glass” and bet on the fund finding support right here and right now, or do you want to look at the half-empty of the “IBUY glass” and fear of the fund breaking down soon with nothing on the way to stop the price from falling a lot more?
For us, this is a “No-Go” type of risk/reward, even though we believe IBUY is more interesting than XRT at this point in time.

Y-Charts, Author
Yet, even with all this retail doom and gloom, we believe that some of the big, legacy, retailers are worthwhile having a closer look at current valuations.
Forward P/E ratios in the single-digit, or even low-mid doubt-digit, area are quite attractive multiples for this industry.

Y-Charts
Same goes to forward P/S ratios that are ridiculously low, and if not for the lousy economic outlook would have made many of these names a crying buy.

Y-Charts
I mean, when was the last time you could have bought AMZN with a P/S ratio < 2? The answer is about 8 years ago, and it’s unreal to get Amazon today for a similar multiple, regardless of anything else you might wish to say in favor/against the stock/company.

Y-Charts, Author
Of course, there’s this tiny thing called recession that (if and when) is going to cut both top and bottom lines of these retailers massively, turning all these multiples upside (and not) down.
For that reason, we don’t think this is a good time to push money into the retail industry, surely not into retail ETFs.
Having said that, there are more than a handful names that deserve a closer look only a couple of months down the (economic downturn) road.
Wheel of FORTUNE is a most comprehensive service, covering all asset-classes: common stocks, preferred shares, bonds, options, currencies, commodities, ETFs, and CEFs.

Our Funds Macro Portfolio is outperforming SPY by ~22% YTD while taking ~1/3 less risk!

This article was written by
On a strictly formal note…

The Fortune Teller (“TFT”) is a well-known contributor on Seeking Alpha (“SA”), and a top blogger according to TipRanks, with over 30 years of deep and direct market experience.

TFT is the leading moderator of two services on SA: Wheel of Fortune and Macro Trading Factory (led by TFT’s “mirage identity” called The Macro Teller, or “TMT”)

TFT is an account that represents a business which is mostly focuses on portfolio- and asset- management. The business is run by two principles that (among the two of them) hold BAs in Accounting & Economics, and Compute Sciences, as well as MBAs. One of the two is also a licensed CPA (although many years have gone by since he was practicing), and has/had been a licensed investment adviser in various countries, including the US (Series 7 & 66).
On a combined basis, the two principles lived and worked for at least three years in three other-different countries/continents, holding senior-managerial positions across various industries/activities:
On one hand/principal, IT, R&D, Cloud, AI/ML, Security/Fraud, Scalability, Enterprise Software, Agile Methodologies, and Mobile Applications.
On the other hand/principal, Accounting, Banking, Wealth Management, Portfolio Management and Fund Management.

Currently, they run a business which is mainly focusing on active portfolio/fund/asset management as well as providing consulting/advisory services. The business, co-founded in 2011, is also occasionally getting involved in real estate and early-stage (start-up) investments.

The people who work in and for this business are an integral and essential part of the services that we offer on SA Marketplace platform: Wheel of Fortune, and Market Trading Factory. While TFT (or TMT for that matter) is the single “face” behind these services, it’s important for readers/subscribers to know that what they get is not a “one-man-show” rather the end-result of an ongoing, relentless, team effort.

We strongly believe that successful investors must have/perform Discipline, Patience, and Consistency (or “DCP”). We adhere to those rigorously.

The contributor RoseNose is both a contributing and promoting author for Macro Trading Factory. 

On a more personal note…

We’re advising and consulting to private individuals, mostly (U)HNWI that we had been serving through many years of working within the private banking, wealth management and asset management arenas. This activity focuses on the long run and it’s mostly based on a Buy & Hold strategy.

Risk management is part of our DNA and while we normally take LONG-naked positions, we play defense too, by occasionally hedging our positions, in order to protect the downside.

We cover all asset-classes by mostly focusing on cash cows and high dividend paying “machines” that may generate high (total) returns: Interest-sensitive, income-generating, instruments, e.g. Bonds, REITs, BDCs, Preferred Shares, MLPs, etc. combined with a variety of high-risk, growth and value stocks.

We believe in, and invest for, the long run but we’re very minded of the short run too. While it’s possible to make a massive-quick “kill”, here and there, good things usually come in small packages (and over time); so do returns. Therefore, we (hope but) don’t expect our investments to double in value over a short period of time. We do, however, aim at outperforming the S&P 500, on a risk adjusted basis, and to deliver positive returns on an absolute basis, i.e. regardless of markets’ returns and directions.
Note: “Aim” doesn’t equate guarantee!!! We can’t, and never will, promise a positive return!!! Everything that we do is on a “best effort” basis, without any assurance that the actual results would meet our good intentions.

Timing is Everything! While investors can’t time the market, we believe that this applies only to the long term. In the short-term (a couple of months) one can and should pick the right moment and the right entry point, based on his subjective-personal preferences, risk aversion and goals. Long-term, strategy/macro, investment decisions can’t be timed while short-term, implementation/micro, investment decision, can!

When it comes to investments and trading we believe that the most important virtues are healthy common sense, general wisdom, sufficient research, vast experience, strive for excellence, ongoing willingness to learn, minimum ego, maximum patience, ability to withstand (enormous) pressure/s, strict discipline and a lot of luck!…
Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of AMZN, TGT either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: TipRanks:
SELL ratings to ANF, PTON, ONLN, RETL, IBUY, XRT, RTH, AEO, BKE, BKNG, BURL, CHWY, CPRT, DASH, ETSY, FIVE, GPS, ODP, ROST, RVLV, SSTK, URBN
BUY rating to AMZN, COST, CVS, TGT, WBA, ACI, KR

source