Premium Wordpress Plugins

Congress Investigation Reveals U.S. Intelligence Community Slow to Respond to COVID-19 – Foreign Policy

FP columnists and contributors recommend their favorite books they read this year.
Soaring demand for luxury furniture in Asia is decimating Ghana’s forests while creating a lucrative but environmentally destructive industry.
How the war in Ukraine will remake the continent.
The war in Ukraine is more about artillery shells than cyberexploits—for now.
Report: U.S. Intel Community Dropped the Ball on COVID-19, Congress Finds U.S. Intel Community Dropped the Ball on COV… | View Comments ()

NEW FOR SUBSCRIBERS: Click + to receive email alerts for new stories written by Amy Mackinnon
The U.S. intelligence community was slow to respond to the threat posed by the emerging COVID-19 pandemic in the first weeks of 2020, a report released Thursday by the House Intelligence Committee concluded. It also said U.S. officials were slow to collect the kinds of intelligence required to inform policymakers in the early phase of the outbreak in China. 
The report, the result of a two-and-a-half-year review conducted by the Democrat-led congressional body, concluded that the sprawling U.S. intelligence community was ill-equipped to respond to the fast-moving crisis. 
“The intelligence community as a whole did not pivot quickly enough to train its unique assets at this deadly problem set,” committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff wrote in a letter accompanying the release of a declassified version of the report. 
The U.S. intelligence community was slow to respond to the threat posed by the emerging COVID-19 pandemic in the first weeks of 2020, a report released Thursday by the House Intelligence Committee concluded. It also said U.S. officials were slow to collect the kinds of intelligence required to inform policymakers in the early phase of the outbreak in China. 
The report, the result of a two-and-a-half-year review conducted by the Democrat-led congressional body, concluded that the sprawling U.S. intelligence community was ill-equipped to respond to the fast-moving crisis. 
“The intelligence community as a whole did not pivot quickly enough to train its unique assets at this deadly problem set,” committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff wrote in a letter accompanying the release of a declassified version of the report. 
The committee’s findings, detailed in an extensive declassified report, underscore how intelligence agencies have struggled to retool away from the threat posed by terrorism, a central focus of the past two decades, to the amorphous challenges posed by transnational threats, such as pandemics, which scientists fear could become more frequent due to climate change.
Despite multiple warnings from previous directors of national intelligence about the threat posed by infectious diseases, intelligence-gathering on health security and pandemics was patchy, the report concluded. The National Center for Medical Intelligence (which the report notes did “admirable work” early on) is tucked away within the Pentagon, where it struggled to draw the attention of the wider intelligence community, the National Security Council, and Congress. 
In January 2020, as the Chinese city of Wuhan, the epicenter of the outbreak, was forced into lockdown, U.S. intelligence reporting on the outbreak was based on “open-source reporting, diplomatic reporting.” As Beijing went to great lengths to downplay and stifle information about the severity of the outbreak, intelligence agencies were slow to train their clandestine collection resources to track the emerging threat posed by the virus. It was not until Jan. 29 that a directive was issued across the intelligence community to increase collection on the crisis. 
Despite a slow start, the report notes that by the end of January 2020, intelligence agencies were providing “clear and consistent warning” about the virus’s potential to become a pandemic—weeks before then-U.S. President Donald Trump declared a national emergency in March. The report, which was based on interviews with intelligence officials and policymakers as well as reviews of internal assessments, challenges claims made by Trump in May 2020 that the intelligence community reporting on the emerging outbreak was “nonthreatening” or “matter of fact.” 
“The divergence between the intelligence community’s late January conclusions and the former president’s rhetoric is striking,” the report notes, adding that by early February, the president’s daily intelligence briefing warned that the virus had spread to such a point that it was unlikely to be contained. Since the outbreak of the pandemic—which the report notes has killed more Americans than all combat deaths of every war America has ever fought in—steps have been taken to place a renewed focus on the national security threat posed by global health challenges and biological threats, but the committee notes there is still more to be done. 
The report includes a number of classified recommendations as well as seven unclassified ones. It calls for the designation of a global health security center within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to invest in the use of big data-driven, open-source intelligence gathering as well as better integration with public health agencies and for the intel community to recalibrate. After the intelligence community spent two decades fighting terrorism, the report suggests a slight shift in focus.
“Those threats traditionally labeled as ‘soft,’ including potential pandemics, can be just as, or even more, deadly than traditional national security threats, and the [international community] and policymakers alike cannot lose sight of that reality,” Schiff notes in the opening letter.
Amy Mackinnon is a national security and intelligence reporter at
Commenting on this and other recent articles is just one benefit of a Foreign Policy subscription.
Already a subscriber? .

View Comments
Join the conversation on this and other recent Foreign Policy articles when you subscribe now.

Not your account?
View Comments
Please follow our comment guidelines, stay on topic, and be civil, courteous, and respectful of others’ beliefs.


The default username below has been generated using the first name and last initial on your FP subscriber account. Usernames may be updated at any time and must not contain inappropriate or offensive language.


NEW FOR SUBSCRIBERS: Want to read more on this topic or region? Click + to receive email alerts when new stories are published on Politics, Pandemics, United States
Read More
Disease threats are not just the health sector’s problem.
Sign up for Morning Brief
You’re on the list! More ways to stay updated on global news:
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
Editors’ Picks
Diplomacy is neither intrinsically moral nor always strategically wise.
Modern-day Ukrainian partisans are quietly working to undermine the occupation.
The war in Ukraine has turned Europe’s most powerful countries against each other like hardly ever before.
Washington’s crackdown on technology access is creating a new kind of global conflict.
Sign up for Morning Brief
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
Your guide to the most important world stories of the day. Delivered Monday-Friday.
Essential analysis of the stories shaping geopolitics on the continent. Delivered Wednesday.
One-stop digest of politics, economics, and culture. Delivered Friday.
The latest news, analysis, and data from the country each week. Delivered Wednesday.
Weekly update on developments in India and its neighbors. Delivered Thursday.
Weekly update on what’s driving U.S. national security policy. Delivered Thursday.
A curated selection of our very best long reads. Delivered Wednesday & Sunday.
Evening roundup with our editors’ favorite stories of the day. Delivered Monday-Saturday.
A monthly digest of the top articles read by FP subscribers.
Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER?
Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER?
Geopolitics dominated the world in 2022, with Russia’s war in Ukraine and competition between the United States and China impacting everything from energy to food to semiconductors. What t…Show more
By signing up, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to occasionally receive special offers from Foreign Policy.
Registered
Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER?
Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER?
David Miliband’s job is to anticipate and respond to the world’s worst crises, so his organization—the International Rescue Committee—can figure out how to help people rebuild their …Show more
By signing up, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to occasionally receive special offers from Foreign Policy.
Registered
Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER?
Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER?
Remember the adage that generals always fight the last war? Of late, we at FP have been wondering: What can Russia’s war in Ukraine teach the world going forward? What have we learned so f…Show more
For Saudis like me, nothing could be more disheartening than a divorce from the United States.
Many of the problems from the initial draft have been solved.
The war in Ukraine is more about artillery shells than cyberexploits—for now.
The country is meant to go to the polls next year. It might erupt first.

source

COPYRIGHT @ 2024 - WPHobby